One might wonder if the President’s son, Hunter Biden, an accomplished drug addict, ever kicked his drug habit. The recent discovery of cocaine in the ‘West Wing,’ family living quarters shouldn’t be a surprise for those in the ‘know.’
Having previously served in law enforcemnt for a number of years, based on my experience, Hunter is still under the ‘influence’ of drugs. It was reported that the ‘coke’ was found after his last visit, previous to yesterday’s 4th of July visit to the White House – all bets are off, in my opinion, that Ole’ Joe’s ‘wunderkin’ is still under the influence.
Following reports of the find by the Secret Service, a number of media outlets jumped on the band wagon salivating over the prospect of a ‘juicy’ scandal the like of which not seen since Bill Clintin’s cigar caper, under his Oval Office desk….stand by formore to come.
Former President Trump, during a campaign rally in South Carolina last week, described Joe Biden as a “corrupt and comprimised president.” We might proffer in light of facts now being exposed, it is no longer speculative that Joe Biden has been engaged in illegal activity, to wit, taking money from foreign enemies like China and others believed, though not yet named, for he and his familys personal benefit. The Biden family’s alleged activities would seem qualified to be indictctable under the RICO ACT statues.
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) of 1970 seeks to strengthen the legal tools in evidence gathering by establishing new penal prohibitions and providing enhanced sanctions and new remedies for dealing with the unlawful activities of those engaged in organized crime. [1]
Looking further Biden’s activities, which some have said, might well constitute as treasonous given his policies that seems to benefit China, a foreign enemy actively working to undermine our global influence and national security.
In October of 2022 an article refernced on The Council on Foreign relations website stated ‘ China appears to be increasingly interfering in U.S. elections through intensive lobbying, control of foreign media outlets, and sophisticated disinformation campaigns.’ [2]
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.Article III, Section 3, Clause 1: [3]
It would seem that Joe biden’s policies and personal greed have brought our republic to a point that if he, or whoever his masters put in place, continue Biden’s disasterous political agenda, we will end up in a civil war that might well destroy our republic……As always, just my opinion- WFM
[1] Public law: 91-452 U.S.C. sections created: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1… Effective: October 15, 197o Statutes at Large: 84 Stat. 922-3 aka 84 Stat. 9…
[2] Asia Program, Renewing America, and Diamosteing, Project on the Future of Democracy – Council on Foreign Relations, October, 2022
[3] U.S.Constitution Article III, Section 3, Clause 1:
The empty brain pans on the left will use any excuse to charge Donald Trump with whatever false allegations their elitist masters tell them to. Let’s face it, much like the ‘Russian Collusion hoax’ this current circus will not end until either Merrick Garland or Donald Trump end up in prison.
To quote the late comedian Richard Pryor who once said, “the only justice is ‘just us.’ Considering the current state of ‘justice’ or rather ‘injustice, perpertrated under Merrick Garland’s corrupt reign as Attorney General, Priors statement has proven prophetic, my opimion of course….
All the things that Americans are coping with thanks to Joe Biden’s complete horror of a presidency are important, but if House Republicans don’t drop all of it right now to aggressively target the attorney general, then none of it matters and they should all jump off a cliff.
Seriously. Merrick Garland, Biden’s head of the nation’s premier law enforcement agency, just chose to seek prison time for a former president, the man right now most likely to face off with the current president in 2024.
The magnitude of the situation isn’t dependent on a conviction or acquittal. It rests on whether the indictment is legitimized at all. And by doing nothing, House Republicans will have sent the message that there’s nothing to do but watch — watch as your democracy crumbles to ashes and blows away with their absolute indifference.
In that scenario, nothing separates us from Cuba. Or in terms that Democrats can understand, nothing separates us from RUSSIA, YOU PUTIN SOCK SNIFFERS!
If House Republicans play this game of “let’s see what the facts say” and “there will be blowback if we overreach,” then it’s over. When Democrats were in power, they impeached a sitting president twice, sued to secure his personal tax returns, and brought in a slew of witnesses to embarrass him in televised hearings without batting an eye. The bare minimum Republicans can do now is impeach Merrick Garland for attempting to throw a leading presidential candidate in jail over a records-keeping issue.
Yeah, historical government records are important and if Trump had things in his possession that weren’t his, the government was in its right to retrieve them. There’s a legal and lawyerly process for that. But initial news reports indicate that the Justice Department is throwing the book at him over classified documents Trump retained, something his vice president, former President Obama, and Joe Biden himself have done.
There are apparently also charges related to obstruction and conspiracy. Those are charges that Hillary Clinton never faced, even though her set-up of a private email server to conduct government business, which she wiped clean after leaving office as secretary of state, was by definition obstruction and conspiracy. The sitting director of the FBI said at the time that Clinton was “extremely careless” in handling government secrets. No indictment.
By every measure, Merrick Garland has corrupted his office in the persecution of a prominent political opponent who is actively campaigning to unseat Garland’s boss. Garland’s entire tenure has reeked of retribution for having been denied a Supreme Court seat in 2016. He has claimed that white supremacy is the foremost domestic threat to America, by which he means “Trump supporters.” He has directed his department to harass concerned parents who show up at school board meetings. And while he chases down pro-life activists exercising their First Amendment rights, he does nothing to actual domestic terrorists waging a violent war against pro-life pregnancy clinics.
Nobody needs to see House Speaker Kevin McCarthy on Fox News confessing what a scandal it is, or how outraged Americans should be. The Oversight Committee should be dragging in Justice Department officials for hearings, investigating Justice Department communications with the White House, and immediately drafting articles of impeachment for Merrick Garland.
By Jack Davis June 8, 2023 The Western Journal (Annotated)
Meanwhile too many Americans, adept at displaying ‘Trump deraingement syndrome, sans discernable intellect, are so mired in hate of Trump, having no ability to critically analyize truth from fantasy, are nothing more….in my opinion….than useful idiots complicit with those incremntally underming our republic….
Amid reports that the Department of Justice is planning to drop an indictment on former President Donald Trump for his handling of classified documents, a new report has emerged that runs contrary to the narrative that the former president never followed the rules.
According to a report from CNN, a former official who served in the White House during the Trump and Obama administrations as an adviser on declassifying documents, provided specific instances of when Trump ensured everything was done by the book.
The former official, whose name was withheld by CNN, said Trump knew the process for properly declassifying documents….
The official, who was interviewed by the Justice Department in the Trump probe and the department’s investigation into President Joe Biden’s handling of classified documents, said the tone of each probe was very different.
When comparing the questioning about Biden to that about Trump, the former official said, “You wouldn’t expect it to match the intensity, and it didn’t.”
Stevens proved that male and female identity were determined by chromosomes.
A pioneering cytogeneticist and researcher at Bryn Mawr College, outside Philadelphia, Stevens discovered in 1905 that sex is determined by hereditary traits passed through chromosomes….
Females are born with a pair of XX chromosomes, inheriting an X from both the mother and father. Males are born with XY chromosomes; the X is from the mother, the Y from the father.
Stevens further discovered that the determinant X or Y chromosome was passed through the father.
Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes. One pair, known as the sex chromosomes, determines male or female gender.
It’s settled science today. But her work revolutionized the burgeoning field of genetics at the turn of the 20th century.
Will wonders ever cease – probably not….the title of the article should have read : Low Hanging fruit on display….every trans mans dream….
A Washington judge has ordered a women-only spa to accept transgender women who still have penises — even though all of its customers are naked.
Seattle District Court Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein on Monday upheld a discrimination ruling against Olympus Spa filed by local trans activist Haven Wilvich, who claims to be “more woman” than many feminists who’re “only incidental.”
The traditional Korean Spa had maintained that its “women-only rule … is essential for the safety, legal protection, and well-being of our customers.”
It willingly accepted transgender women — but “only if they have ‘gone through post-operative sex confirmation surgery,’” the ruling noted.
Wilvich, however, “‘identifies as a woman’ but ‘is biologically male and has not undergone sex reassignment surgery,’” the court papers said — noting that the spa never had a record of the activist ever actually going there.
For a long time, it wasn’t possible to immigrate illegally to the U.S.
BY: BECKY LITTLE – The History Channel, July 2019 (Full Article)
Until the late 19th century, there wasn’t any such thing as “illegal” or “legal” immigration to the United States. That’s because before you can immigrate somewhere illegally, there has to be a law for you to break.
American immigration didn’t really begin until the late 1700s, when the United States became an independent nation. Before that, Africans had unwillingly entered the Americas as enslaved peoples and Europeans had entered as settlers. While immigrants are beholden to the laws of the land they migrate to, settlers come to disrupt the current system and implement their own laws, write the scholars Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang.
But once the U.S. made its Constitution the new law of the land, immigrants flocked to the country with few restrictions. This didn’t mean that they were welcomed in the “New World.” In the beginning, when immigrants came mostly from northern and western Europe, anti-Irish and anti-Catholic sentiment were rampant. By the mid- to late-19th century, people from southern and eastern Europe as well as China were coming over, and Americans resented the presence of Chinese, Italians, and more Catholics.
THE WALLS OF A HOLDING AREA IN THE ANGEL ISLAND IMMIGRATION STATION FEATURE INSCRIPTIONS FROM IMMIGRANTS WHO WERE DETAINED THERE. DUE TO PROLONGED QUESTIONING, SOME IMMIGRANTS WERE DETAINED FOR MONTHS, OR EVEN YEARS.
Although some states like California passed local immigration laws during this time, these laws either weren’t well enforced or were thrown out by courts, says Madeline Y. Hsu, a professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin. In fact, there were no federal laws governing who could enter and who couldn’t until the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.
At the time, Chinese people worked in gold mines, factories, railroads, and agriculture, especially on the West Coast. Although these immigrants made up only .002 percent of the U.S. population, white Americans blamed them for low wages and other economic problems. To placate economic and racial anxieties, the exclusion act banned almost all immigration from China, making only a few exceptions for special groups like students and diplomats. In addition, the Immigration Act passed that same year banned people who were poor, mentally ill, or convicted of crimes from entering the country.
Because only a very narrow group of Chinese people could legally immigrate, “the acting presumption was that if you’re Chinese you must have come in illegally,” Hsu says. “Chinese become the only group required to carry around certificates of residence, which are intended to show—to document—that they have in fact entered legally.” In 1917, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
Asian exclusion continued with the 1924 Immigration Act, which banned all people who could not become naturalized citizens per the 1790 Naturalization Act. That naturalization law had originally said that only free white people could become naturalized citizens. Yet by 1924, previously excluded groups like Mexicans, Black Americans, and Native Americans had won citizenship rights, and the law really only applied to Asians.
Immigrants at Ellis IslandPlay Video
But the biggest change the 1924 act made to immigration policy was introducing numerical caps or quotas based on country of origin. These quotas gave enormous preference to people from northern and western Europe over those from southern and eastern parts of the continent. The previous restrictions on Asian immigrants had made “very little impact on the growing levels of immigration to the United States,” Hsu says, because the vast majority of immigrants came from Europe. These new quotas were meant to address “a sense of crisis” that America was accepting too many immigrants, particularly too many non-Anglo Saxon ones.
The 1924 act resurfaced in the news in September 2017 when United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that the U.S. would end DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), a policy to give people who came to the U.S. as undocumented children a legal avenue to stay. Sessions had earlier stated that the 1924 Immigration Act “was good for America.”
But according to Mae M. Ngai, a professor of Asian American studies and history at Columbia University, “the 1924 act is considered almost universally to be a stain on our history.”
“It ranked people from all over the world on a kind of hierarchy of desirability based on their race and national origin,” she says. “There is no controversy over that.”
ELLIS ISLAND’S GREAT HALL
The 1924 quota system remained largely in place until the 1960s, when a new law established a new system. Each year, there is a cap on the total number of visas that the U.S. can issue. According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the U.S. cannot issue more than 7 percent of the total allowable visas to one nation.
Before this change in 1965, there had been no numeric caps on immigration within the Americas. So when the U.S. decided that it would only take a certain percentage of people from each nation per year, it was the first time the U.S. had put an official cap on Mexican immigration.
Prior to this, Mexican immigrants freely, and commonly, found work in the United States. Yet after the Hart-Celler Immigration Act was passed, “Whole groups of migrants from Mexico and Latin America whose entrance to the U.S. would have been considered legal before 1965 suddenly became illegal,” writesJane Hong, a history professor at Occidental College, in The L.A. Times.
“There’s a lot of talk about the DACA students and [accusations] that it’s an unlawful program,” Hsu says. “The problem with that is that you can always change laws,” she continues. “Laws are constantly changed in order to accommodate actual circumstances.”
Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door….Ellis Island
The welcoming inscription that early imigrants saw upn arrival at Ellis Island is no longer, in my opinion, valid as a descriptor of expectation for our current wave of immigrants who illegally enter the U.S. through our southern border.Those earlier immigrants were for the most part poor, uneducated, true victims of poverty and class oppression. The current wave, in my opinion, are shameless opportunists looking for a golden door….
I will make a prediction: The Border Patrol is already overwhelmed courtesy of Biden and elitist progs controlling the WH. One might wonder how many cartel ‘Sicarios,’ (cartel soldiers) have infiltrated the border? I believe that within the next six months sections of these ‘blue’ cities will be controlled by these mutants and not long after that, (in my opinion) a real insurrection by those Sicarios under cartel control will erupt.
We can bet that DHS under the leadership of the current leftist troll has proven he like the DOJ, FBI and FBI delegated to protect and defend our borders has been compromised by progs, leftist radicals, will use any insurrection by the so called ‘got aways’ to bring their full weight down on law abiding Americans aided by the leftist media and their DNC allies will make their move to bring down our republic once and for all.
‘James Madison, known as ‘Father of the Constitution’ and author of the Bill of Rights, felt…. the Federal government should be limited to its enumerated powers.’
Excoriating the democrat’s for being the party of ‘exclusivity’ which actually is an admission that even empty brain pans and soicalists, ie one and the same,’ are allowed to particpate in their faux political reality, however, I might add some republicans, though on a smaller scale, are just as moronic as the aforementioned using Rep George Santos as a primary example in the fantasy world of political realities.
Mr. ‘T’ from the tv show ‘The A Team’ had a saying that would apply to all I’ve mentioned: “Suffer the fools.,” and suffer we will with the upcoming presidential election buffonary waiting to assault those who have even a modicum of intellect that allows for rationalizing
If you happen to have any leftover diazepam, better known as ‘mother’s little helpers,’ you might want to renew your prescription because we are in for some rough times ahead….
Booger Sugar Found In The White House
WFM – JULY 5, 2023
One might wonder if the President’s son, Hunter Biden, an accomplished drug addict, ever kicked his drug habit. The recent discovery of cocaine in the ‘West Wing,’ family living quarters shouldn’t be a surprise for those in the ‘know.’
Having previously served in law enforcemnt for a number of years, based on my experience, Hunter is still under the ‘influence’ of drugs. It was reported that the ‘coke’ was found after his last visit, previous to yesterday’s 4th of July visit to the White House – all bets are off, in my opinion, that Ole’ Joe’s ‘wunderkin’ is still under the influence.
Following reports of the find by the Secret Service, a number of media outlets jumped on the band wagon salivating over the prospect of a ‘juicy’ scandal the like of which not seen since Bill Clintin’s cigar caper, under his Oval Office desk….stand by for more to come.